Car comparison

Volvo XC40 2.0 T4vsSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC40

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI330

186 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC40 2.0 T4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    896 km
    556 mi
  • Largest trunk
    463 L
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC402.0 T4SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
190hp142kW
186hp139kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,647kg3,631lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Gross weight
2,160kg4,762lb
-
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
88.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
53.8s
Calculated
56.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
818km508mi
Calculated
896km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,425mm174in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,863mm73in
1,883mm74in
Height
1,652mm65in
1,649mm65in
Wheelbase
2,702mm106in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,601mm63in
-
Rear track
1,626mm64in
-
Trunk volume
460L
463L
Max trunk volume-
1,607L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
54L
60L
CO2 emissions
154g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC40 2.0 T4Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC402.0 T44,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3304,100-6,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC402.0 T4SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
53.8 s
56.1 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW

Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 has 4 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T4
1,647 kg
3,631 lb
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T4
210 km/h
130 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T48.4 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3308.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T4
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T4
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC402.0 T4
818 km
508 mi
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
896 km
556 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC402.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
8.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC402.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC402.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC402.0 T4
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
8.4 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC402.0 T4
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC402.0 T4SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
190 hp
142 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.8 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,647 kg
3,631 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Range score
818 km
508 mi
896 km
556 mi
CO2 score
154 g/km
-
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC40 2.0 T4Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC40 2.0 T4

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 47 kg lighter
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 77 km (48 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 3 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 vs Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 - car comparison - FastVsFaster