Jaguar E-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200vsVolvo XC40 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Best estimated range835 km519 mi
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Lightest1,647 kg3,631 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions154 g/km
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,757kg3,874lb | 1,647kg3,631lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.1s Calculated | 53.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 835km519mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,634mm64in | 1,626mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 1,234L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,577L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 186g/km | 154g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.1 s | 53.7 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has 10 hp more than Volvo XC40 2.0 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 1,757 kg 3,874 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 835 km 519 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 818 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,757 kg 3,874 lb | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 835 km 519 mi | 818 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 186 g/km | 154 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Has 774 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 32 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























