Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200vsVolvo XC40 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P200

200 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC40

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    216 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    835 km
    519 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Volvo XC40 2.0 T4

  • Lightest
    1,647 kg
    3,631 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    115 hp/t
    86 kW/t
    8.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    154 g/km
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200VolvoXC402.0 T4
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,757kg3,874lb
1,647kg3,631lb
Gross weight-
2,160kg4,762lb
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
94.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
47.1s
Calculated
53.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
835km519mi
Calculated
818km508mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,425mm174in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,863mm73in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,652mm65in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,702mm106in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,601mm63in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,626mm64in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
-
Trunk volume
1,234L
460L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
54L
CO2 emissions
186g/km
154g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200Volvo XC40 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2005,500 rpm1,250 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC402.0 T44,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200VolvoXC402.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.1 s
53.7 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
200 hp
149 kW
VolvoXC402.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has 10 hp more than Volvo XC40 2.0 T4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
VolvoXC402.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
1,757 kg
3,874 lb
VolvoXC402.0 T4
1,647 kg
3,631 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
216 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC402.0 T4
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2008.2 s
VolvoXC402.0 T48.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T4
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
VolvoXC402.0 T4
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
835 km
519 mi
VolvoXC402.0 T4
818 km
508 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
200 hp
149 kW
8.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC402.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
8.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
VolvoXC402.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
8.2 s
VolvoXC402.0 T4
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T4
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200VolvoXC402.0 T4
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
8.4 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,757 kg
3,874 lb
1,647 kg
3,631 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Range score
835 km
519 mi
818 km
508 mi
CO2 score
186 g/km
154 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km11.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi18.59 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal990 L262 US gal218 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year1,733 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 774 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC40 2.0 T4

  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 32 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 vs Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster