AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIvsVolvo XC40 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Best estimated range1,161 km721 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Lightest1,647 kg3,631 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,647kg3,631lb |
| Gross weight | 2,475kg5,456lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.6s Calculated | 53.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,161km721mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,626mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 460L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 154g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.6 s | 53.7 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 8.1 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,161 km 721 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 818 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,161 km 721 mi | 818 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 154 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 343 km (213 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Is 123 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























