AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY)
40 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,161 km721 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | 2,475kg5,456lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 107.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 88.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 42.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 890km553mi Calculated | 1,161km721mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 4,663mm184in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,645mm65in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,473L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 42.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has 14 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 8.6 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 8.1 s |
Although AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 890 km 553 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,161 km 721 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 890 km 553 mi | 1,161 km 721 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 270 km (168 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























