Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,647 kg3,631 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions154 g/km
- Best economy score89/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Best estimated range822 km511 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,927kg4,248lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | - |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 82.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.7s Calculated | 63.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 818km508mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.7 s | 63.5 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 818 km 508 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 822 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 818 km 508 mi | 822 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Is 280 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km (2 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























