Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 20dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

20d

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    219 km/h
    136 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,615 kg
    3,560 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    126 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,063 km
    660 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)20dVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,615kg3,560lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Gross weight
2,205kg4,861lb
-
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
78.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
82.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
38.1s
Calculated
63.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,063km660mi
Calculated
822km511mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
505L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
60L
CO2 emissions
126g/km
169g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 20dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T45,000 rpm1,620-4,020 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)20dVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.1 s
63.5 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
1,927 kg
4,248 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
219 km/h
136 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d7.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T47.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,063 km
660 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
822 km
511 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
219 km/h
136 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)20d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)20dVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
1,927 kg
4,248 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,063 km
660 mi
822 km
511 mi
CO2 score
126 g/km
169 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 20dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 312 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 241 km (149 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 43 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20d vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster