BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20dvsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions126 g/km
- Best estimated range1,063 km660 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20d | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.1s Calculated | 38.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 1,041km647mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 126g/km | 130g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20d | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.1 s | 38.7 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.8 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,041 km 647 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20d | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | 1,041 km 647 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 126 g/km | 130 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20d | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 km (13 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























