Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 20dvsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

20d

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Fastest top speed
    219 km/h
    136 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    126 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,063 km
    660 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)20dMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,615kg3,560lb
1,575kg3,472lb
Gross weight
2,205kg4,861lb
2,170kg4,784lb
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
78.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
78.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
38.1s
Calculated
38.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,063km660mi
Calculated
1,041km647mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,299mm169in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,822mm72in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,557mm61in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,563mm62in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
165mm6in
Trunk volume
505L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,390L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
51L
CO2 emissions
126g/km
130g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 20dMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0PowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)20dMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.1 s
38.7 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,575 kg
3,472 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
219 km/h
136 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d7.8 s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.07.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,063 km
660 mi
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,041 km
647 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
219 km/h
136 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.8 s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)20d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)20dMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.6 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Range score
1,063 km
660 mi
1,041 km
647 mi
CO2 score
126 g/km
130 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 20dMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 22 km (13 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 4 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20d vs Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster