Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0vsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,041 km647 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | 2,195kg4,839lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.1s Calculated | 38.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km486mi Calculated | 1,041km647mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 130g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.1 s | 38.7 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 has 14 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 7.1 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 783 km 486 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,041 km 647 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 486 mi | 1,041 km 647 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 130 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 258 km (160 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























