Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsBMW X1 (F48) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (F48)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best estimated range1,109 km689 mi
- Best economy score94/100
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 78.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.3s Calculated | 38.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,109km689mi Calculated | 1,063km660mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,439mm175in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,821mm72in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | 183mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.3 s | 38.1 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.9 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,109 km 689 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,063 km 660 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | BMWX1 (F48)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,109 km 689 mi | 1,063 km 660 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 | BMW X1 (F48) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 46 km (29 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























