AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Best estimated range1,161 km721 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,927kg4,248lb |
| Gross weight | 2,475kg5,456lb | - |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 82.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.6s Calculated | 63.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,161km721mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.6 s | 63.5 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 8.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 1,161 km 721 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 822 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,161 km 721 mi | 822 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 157 kg lighter
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 339 km (211 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























