Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best estimated range1,109 km689 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,927kg4,248lb |
| Gross weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | - |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 82.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.3s Calculated | 63.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,109km689mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.3 s | 63.5 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,109 km 689 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 822 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,109 km 689 mi | 822 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 417 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 287 km (178 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 47 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T4
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























