Skoda Kodiaq I
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330vsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 Skyactiv-X
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful186 hp139 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk463 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
- Lightest1,538 kg3,391 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range980 km609 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 186hp139kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 224Nm165lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,538kg3,391lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,042kg4,502lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 81.1s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 56.1s Calculated | 67.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 146Nm/t97lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 896km556mi Calculated | 980km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,883mm74in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,655mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 463L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,607L | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 111g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 4,100-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 56.1 s | 67.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 186 hp 139 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 180 hp 134 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 has 6 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 224 Nm 165 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 1,538 kg 3,391 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 8.8 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 896 km 556 mi |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 980 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 186 hp 139 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.9 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 186 hp 139 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 224 Nm 165 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,538 kg 3,391 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 896 km 556 mi | 980 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 111 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 463 L 16.4 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 | Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 96 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
- Is 62 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 84 km (52 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























