Car comparison

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2dvsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015

2.2d

175 hp2191 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2015-2017
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    207 km/h
    129 mph
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,480 kg
    3,263 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    1,115 km
    693 mi
  • Largest trunk
    503 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    111 g/km
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
175hp130kW
180hp134kW
Torque
420Nm310lb-ft
224Nm165lb-ft
Curb weight
1,480kg3,263lb
1,538kg3,391lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
2,042kg4,502lb
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
80.9s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
61.5s
Calculated
67.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
146Nm/t97lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,115km693mi
Calculated
980km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,191cc134cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,555mm179in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,655mm105in
Front track-
1,565mm62in
Rear track-
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
210mm8in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
503L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,620L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
48L
CO2 emissions
136g/km
111g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d4,500 rpm2,000 rpm4,750 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
61.5 s
67.5 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has 5 hp more than Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,538 kg
3,391 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
207 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X8.9 s

Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has more power, Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,115 km
693 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
980 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
8.8 s
207 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
8.9 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
175 hp
130 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.9 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
1,538 kg
3,391 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,115 km
693 mi
980 km
609 mi
CO2 score
136 g/km
111 g/km
Trunk score
503 L
17.8 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Has 196 Nm more
  • Is 58 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 136 km (84 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 73 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 25 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-5 2.2d
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2d
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 Skyactiv-X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.2d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.2d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.2d
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 D4
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.2d
2.0 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.5
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
2.2d
20i
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2 JTDM
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X - car comparison - FastVsFaster