Car comparison

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Tarraco

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI330

186 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    211 km/h
    131 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    760 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    896 km
    556 mi
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatTarraco2.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
190hp142kW
186hp139kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,698kg3,743lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Gross weight
2,380kg5,247lb
-
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
82.6s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
48.8s
Calculated
56.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
822km511mi
Calculated
896km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,735mm186in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,883mm74in
Height
1,674mm66in
1,649mm65in
Wheelbase
2,790mm110in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,585mm62in
-
Rear track
1,574mm62in
-
Ground clearance
192mm8in
-
Trunk volume
760L
463L
Max trunk volume-
1,607L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSISkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330PowerTorque
  • Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3304,100-6,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatTarraco2.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.8 s
56.1 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI has 4 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
1,698 kg
3,743 lb
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
211 km/h
131 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI8.0 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3308.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
822 km
511 mi
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
896 km
556 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
8.0 s
211 km/h
131 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
760 L
26.8 cu ft
Length
4,735 mm
186.4 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
8.0 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatTarraco2.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
190 hp
142 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
8.8 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,698 kg
3,743 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
760 L
26.8 cu ft
Length
4,735 mm
186.4 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Range score
822 km
511 mi
896 km
556 mi
Trunk score
760 L
26.8 cu ft
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Tarraco 2.0 TSISkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 297 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Is 98 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
1.5 TSI EVO
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsSeatArona1.5 TSI EVO
GT TSI330
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
GT TSI330
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.0 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsSeatAronaFacelift 20211.5 TSI
GT TSI330
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
GT TSI330
20d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 TSI
2.0 D4
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsVolvoXC402.0 D4
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
GT TSI330
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.2 JTDM
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 - car comparison - FastVsFaster