Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330vsJaguar F-Pace 20d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI330

186 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

20d

180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 20d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,053 km
    654 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    45/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    186 hp
    139 kW
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330JaguarF-Pace20d
Power
186hp139kW
180hp134kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,790kg3,946lb
Gross weight-
2,380kg5,247lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
208 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
97.5s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
56.1s
Calculated
63.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
896km556mi
Calculated
1,053km654mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,634mm182in
4,731mm186in
Width
1,883mm74in
2,071mm82in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,666mm66in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,874mm113in
Front track-
1,641mm65in
Rear track-
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance-
215mm8in
Trunk volume
463L
-
Max trunk volume
1,607L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions-
150g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330Jaguar F-Pace 20dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 20d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3304,100-6,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
JaguarF-Pace20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330JaguarF-Pace20d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
56.1 s
63.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
208 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
87 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW
JaguarF-Pace20d
180 hp
134 kW

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 has 6 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 20d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 20d and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace20d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
JaguarF-Pace20d
1,790 kg
3,946 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
JaguarF-Pace20d
208 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3308.8 s
JaguarF-Pace20d8.6 s

Although Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 has more power, Jaguar F-Pace 20d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 20d and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace20d
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 20d and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace20d
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
896 km
556 mi
JaguarF-Pace20d
1,053 km
654 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
JaguarF-Pace20d
180 hp
134 kW
8.6 s
208 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
JaguarF-Pace20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.8 s
JaguarF-Pace20d
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace20d
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330JaguarF-Pace20d
Power
186 hp
139 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Range score
896 km
556 mi
1,053 km
654 mi
CO2 score
-
150 g/km
Trunk score
463 L
16.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330Jaguar F-Pace 20d
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Is 190 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Jaguar F-Pace 20d

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 157 km (98 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Jaguar F-Pace 20d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT TSI330
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
20d
2.0d
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
GT TSI330
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
20d
2.0 P200
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
GT TSI330
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
20d
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
GT TSI330
20d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsJaguarF-Pace20d
GT TSI330
2.0 T4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
GT TSI330
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
GT TSI330
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
GT TSI330
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
GT TSI330
2.5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 vs Jaguar F-Pace 20d - car comparison - FastVsFaster