Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I
GT TSI330
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 186hp139kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | - |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.8s Calculated | 56.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 896km556mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,883mm74in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,649mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 463L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,607L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 147g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 4,100-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.8 s | 56.1 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 90 mph | 139 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 186 hp 139 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 896 km 556 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 186 hp 139 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 186 hp 139 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 896 km 556 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 147 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 463 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI | Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 176 km (109 mi) more estimated range
- Has 152 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























