Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330vsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI330

186 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    186 hp
    139 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    463 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Lightest
    1,491 kg
    3,287 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
186hp139kW
180hp134kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
224Nm165lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,491kg3,287lb
Gross weight-
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
79.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
56.1s
Calculated
66.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
150Nm/t101lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
896km556mi
Calculated
981km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,634mm182in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,883mm74in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,655mm105in
Front track-
1,565mm62in
Rear track-
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
463L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,607L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
51L
CO2 emissions-
118g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XPowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3304,100-6,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
56.1 s
66.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
87 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 has 6 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,491 kg
3,287 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3308.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X8.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
896 km
556 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
981 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
8.8 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,491 kg
3,287 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
896 km
556 mi
981 km
609 mi
CO2 score
-
118 g/km
Trunk score
463 L
16.4 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 96 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 33 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Is 109 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 85 km (53 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT TSI330
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
GT TSI330
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.0 Skyactiv-X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
GT TSI330
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
GT TSI330
20d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
GT TSI330
2.0 T4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
GT TSI330
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
GT TSI330
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
GT TSI330
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X - car comparison - FastVsFaster