Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4vsSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I
GT TSI330
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range896 km556 mi
- Largest trunk463 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 186hp139kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,706kg3,761lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | - |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 90.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 55.0s Calculated | 56.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km486mi Calculated | 896km556mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,883mm74in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,649mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | - |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 463L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,607L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 4,100-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 55.0 s | 56.1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 186 hp 139 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 has 4 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,706 kg 3,761 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.5 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 783 km 486 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 896 km 556 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 186 hp 139 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 186 hp 139 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,706 kg 3,761 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 486 mi | 896 km 556 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 463 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 | Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 106 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























