Car comparison

Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7vsVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayman (987C)

2.7

245 hp2687 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2009
VS

Volkswagen Eos

3.2 V6

250 hp3168 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    258 km/h
    160 mph
  • Lightest
    1,300 kg
    2,866 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    188 hp/t
    141 kW/t
    5.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    688 km
    428 mi
  • Largest trunk
    260 L
  • Best overall score
    52/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.4 L/100 km
    17.6 mpg US
    21.1 mpg UK
  • Best practicality score
    44/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayman (987C)2.7VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
245hp183kW
250hp186kW
Torque
273Nm201lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,300kg2,866lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
1,620kg3,571lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
93.6s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph
Calculated
97.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
23.7s
29.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
188hp/t141kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
688km428mi
Calculated
598km371mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,687cc164cu in
3,168cc193cu in
Length
4,341mm171in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,801mm71in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,305mm51in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,415mm95in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,490mm59in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,534mm60in
1,553mm61in
Ground clearance
121mm5in
-
Trunk volume
260L
205L
Max trunk volume-
380L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
64L
55L
CO2 emissions
222g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayman (987C)2.76,500 rpm4,600-6,000 rpm7,300 rpm
VolkswagenEos3.2 V66,250 rpm2,750 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayman (987C)2.7VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.7 s
29.0 s
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
161 km/h
100 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
245 hp
183 kW
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 has 5 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
273 Nm
201 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
1,300 kg
2,866 lb
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
258 km/h
160 mph
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
247 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)2.76.1 s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V67.3 s

Although Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 has more power, Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
188 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
688 km
428 mi
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
598 km
371 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
245 hp
183 kW
6.1 s
258 km/h
160 mph
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
247 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,341 mm
170.9 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
6.1 s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7
188 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayman (987C)2.7VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
245 hp
183 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
273 Nm
201 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
7.3 s
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,300 kg
2,866 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,341 mm
170.9 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
688 km
428 mi
598 km
371 mi
CO2 score
222 g/km
-
Trunk score
260 L
9.2 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
188 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayman (987C) 2.7Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.28 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.19 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,441 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7

  • Is 239 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 90 km (56 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 57 Nm more
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.7
2.9
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7vsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
2.7
2.7
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7vsPorscheCayman (981C)2.7
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
2.7
3.2i V6 24V
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7vsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
3.2 V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
2.7
1.3 Wankel
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7vsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
2.7
3.0 si
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7vsBMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si
3.2 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.7
3.0 TDI
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7vsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI
3.2 V6
630i
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsBMW6 Series (E63)630i
2.7
1.8 T sport
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)2.7vsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T sport
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 vs Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster