Porsche Cayman (981C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7vsPorsche Cayman (987C) 2.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (987C)
2.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Highest torque290 Nm214 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight202 hp/t151 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions183 g/km
- Best estimated range810 km503 mi
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 290Nm214lb-ft | 273Nm201lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,300kg2,866lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 93.6s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.1s Calculated | 23.7s |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t141kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 810km503mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 2,687cc164cu in |
| Length | 4,380mm172in | 4,341mm171in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,415mm95in |
| Front track | - | 1,490mm59in |
| Rear track | - | 1,534mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | 222g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 6,500 rpm | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.1 s | 23.7 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 has 30 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 273 Nm 201 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 258 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 5.6 s |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 and Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 and Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 188 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 810 km 503 mi |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.6 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.1 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 188 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | 273 Nm 201 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 810 km 503 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | 222 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 | Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 17 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 122 km (76 mi) more estimated range
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
- Emits 39 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7
- Is 60 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























