Porsche Cayman (981C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7vsPeugeot RCZ · Facelift 2013 R 1.6 THP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot RCZ · Facelift 2013
R 1.6 THP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot RCZ Facelift 2013 R 1.6 THP
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight211 hp/t157 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions145 g/km
- Best estimated range873 km542 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best performance score63/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 270hp201kW |
| Torque | 290Nm214lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,280kg2,822lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 77.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.1s Calculated | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 211hp/t157kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 810km503mi Calculated | 873km542mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,380mm172in | 4,287mm169in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,958mm77in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,362mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,612mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,593mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 111mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 321L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | 145g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: Power / Torque
- Peugeot RCZ Facelift 2013 R 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.1 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 270 hp 201 kW |
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 has 5 hp more than Peugeot RCZ Facelift 2013 R 1.6 THP.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot RCZ Facelift 2013 R 1.6 THP and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 5.6 s |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 and Peugeot RCZ Facelift 2013 R 1.6 THP: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot RCZ Facelift 2013 R 1.6 THP and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 810 km 503 mi |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 873 km 542 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.6 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 270 hp 201 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot RCZ Facelift 2013 R 1.6 THP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | PeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 810 km 503 mi | 873 km 542 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | 145 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 | Peugeot RCZ Facelift 2013 R 1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 104 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Peugeot RCZ Facelift 2013 R 1.6 THP
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 38 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























