Car comparison

Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7vsBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayman (981C)

2.7

275 hp2706 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2013-2016
VS

BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)

430d

258 hp2993 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2013-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.5 s
  • Highest torque
    560 Nm
    413 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    132 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,140 km
    708 mi
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7

  • Fastest top speed
    264 km/h
    164 mph
  • Most powerful
    275 hp
    205 kW
  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    202 hp/t
    151 kW/t
    4.9 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayman (981C)2.7BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
Power
275hp205kW
258hp192kW
Torque
290Nm214lb-ft
560Nm413lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,540kg3,395lb
Gross weight
1,685kg3,715lb
2,060kg4,542lb
Top speed
264 km/h
164 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.9s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph
Calculated
75.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.6s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
19.1s
Calculated
19.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.7s
Calculated
13.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb
Calculated
168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
364Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
810km503mi
Calculated
1,140km708mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,706cc165cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,380mm172in
4,638mm183in
Width
1,801mm71in
1,825mm72in
Height
1,294mm51in
1,377mm54in
Wheelbase
2,475mm97in
2,810mm111in
Front track-
1,545mm61in
Rear track-
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance-
130mm5in
Trunk volume
425L
445L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
64L
57L
CO2 emissions
183g/km
132g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430dPowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: Power / Torque
  • BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayman (981C)2.77,400 rpm4,500-6,500 rpm7,650 rpm
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d4,000 rpm2,000-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayman (981C)2.7BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.6 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.1 s
19.9 s
Top speed
264 km/h
164 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.7 s
13.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
172 km/h
107 mph
170 km/h
106 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
275 hp
205 kW
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
258 hp
192 kW

Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 has 17 hp more than BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 17 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
290 Nm
214 lb-ft
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
560 Nm
413 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
1,540 kg
3,395 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
264 km/h
164 mph
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (981C)2.75.6 s
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d5.5 s

Although Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 has more power, BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
202 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
810 km
503 mi
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
1,140 km
708 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
275 hp
205 kW
5.6 s
264 km/h
164 mph
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
258 hp
192 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
264 km/h
164 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,294 mm
50.9 in
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,377 mm
54.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
264 km/h
164 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
5.6 s
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7
202 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayman (981C)2.7BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430d
Power
275 hp
205 kW
258 hp
192 kW
Torque
290 Nm
214 lb-ft
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.6 s
5.5 s
Top speed
264 km/h
164 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,294 mm
50.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,377 mm
54.2 in
Range score
810 km
503 mi
1,140 km
708 mi
CO2 score
183 g/km
132 g/km
Trunk score
425 L
15.0 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
202 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayman (981C) 2.7BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km8.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi14.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal750 L198 US gal165 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year1,313 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7

  • Has 17 hp more
  • Is 180 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d

  • Has 270 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 330 km (205 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 51 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.7
2.9
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7vsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
430d
430d
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430dvsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d
2.7
S 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7vsPorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
430d
430d
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430dvsBMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430d
2.7
2.0
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7vsPorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
430d
430d
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430dvsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)Facelift 2017430d
2.7
Cupra 2.0 TSI
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7vsSeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI
430d
430i
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430dvsBMW4 Series Coupe (G22)430i
2.7
Carrera 4 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7vsPorsche911 (991)Carrera 4 3.4
430d
430i
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430dvsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (G26)430i
2.7
R 1.6 THP
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)2.7vsPeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP
430d
430d
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430dvsBMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430d
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 vs BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430d - car comparison - FastVsFaster