Porsche Cayman (987C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7vsAUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Coupe (8J)
3.2i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7
- Fastest top speed258 km/h160 mph
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
- Best power-to-weight188 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions222 g/km
- Best estimated range688 km428 mi
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score82/100
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk290 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 273Nm201lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,300kg2,866lb | 1,410kg3,109lb |
| Gross weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.6s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.7s | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 188hp/t141kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km428mi Calculated | 583km362mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,687cc164cu in | 3,189cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,341mm171in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,352mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,490mm59in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 290L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 700L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 222g/km | 247g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 6,500 rpm | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 2,500-3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.7 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW |
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V has 5 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 273 Nm 201 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 6.1 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 188 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 688 km 428 mi |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 583 km 362 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.1 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW | 5.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 188 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 273 Nm 201 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 428 mi | 583 km 362 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 222 g/km | 247 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 188 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 | AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 18.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,704 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 106 km (66 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 47 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























