Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 2.9vsPorsche Cayman (987C) 2.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (987C)
2.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed263 km/h163 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions214 g/km
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score36/100
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 273Nm201lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,300kg2,866lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.5s99% target: 260 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 93.6s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s | 23.7s |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t141kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,893cc177cu in | 2,687cc164cu in |
| Length | 4,347mm171in | 4,341mm171in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,304mm51in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,415mm95in |
| Front track | 1,490mm59in | 1,490mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,534mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | 222g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 7,200 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 6,500 rpm | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 23.7 s |
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9 has 20 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 and Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 273 Nm 201 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 258 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 5.7 s |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9 and Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 188 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 714 km 444 mi |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.1 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | 188 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9 | PorscheCayman (987C)2.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 273 Nm 201 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | 222 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9 | Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 27 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.7
- Is 60 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























