Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6vsAlfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos

3.2 V6

250 hp3168 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2009
VS

Alfa Romeo Brera

3.2 JTS V6

260 hp3195 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2005-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    247 km/h
    153 mph
  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,539 kg
    3,393 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    162 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.4 L/100 km
    17.6 mpg US
    21.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Best estimated range
    614 km
    382 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEos3.2 V6Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Power
250hp186kW
260hp194kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
322Nm237lb-ft
Curb weight
1,539kg3,393lb
1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
244 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
97.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
87.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
29.0s
Calculated
27.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
598km371mi
Calculated
614km382mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,168cc193cu in
3,195cc195cu in
Length
4,407mm174in
4,413mm174in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,830mm72in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,341mm53in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,528mm100in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,553mm61in
1,559mm61in
Trunk volume
205L
300L
Max trunk volume
380L
610L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions-
270g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEos3.2 V66,250 rpm2,750 rpm6,500 rpm
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V66,300 rpm4,500 rpm6,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEos3.2 V6Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.0 s
27.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
244 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
260 hp
194 kW

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
322 Nm
237 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
1,605 kg
3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
247 km/h
153 mph
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
244 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V67.3 s
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V66.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
598 km
371 mi
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
614 km
382 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
247 km/h
153 mph
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
260 hp
194 kW
6.8 s
244 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,413 mm
173.7 in
Height
1,341 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.3 s
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEos3.2 V6Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
6.8 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
244 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,413 mm
173.7 in
Height
1,341 mm
52.8 in
Range score
598 km
371 mi
614 km
382 mi
CO2 score
-
270 g/km
Trunk score
205 L
7.2 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km19.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi32.11 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year2,993 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Has 8 Nm more
  • Is 66 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 95 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
3.2 JTS V6
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
3.2 JTS V6
3.0 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
3.2 V6
3.2 JTS
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
3.2 JTS V6
3.6 FSI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsVolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
3.2 JTS V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
3.2 V6
2.7
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
3.2 V6
1.3 Wankel
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
3.2 JTS V6
630i
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsBMW6 Series (E63)630i
3.2 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 vs Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster