Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6vsVolkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos

3.2 V6

250 hp3168 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2009
VS

Volkswagen Scirocco III

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2008-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,373 kg
    3,027 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    658 km
    409 mi
  • Largest trunk
    292 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    247 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    162 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEos3.2 V6VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
250hp186kW
200hp149kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,539kg3,393lb
1,373kg3,027lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
97.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
88.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
29.0s
Calculated
26.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
598km371mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,168cc193cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,407mm174in
4,256mm168in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,810mm71in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,404mm55in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,569mm62in
Rear track
1,553mm61in
1,575mm62in
Trunk volume
205L
292L
Max trunk volume
380L
755L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEos3.2 V66,250 rpm2,750 rpm6,500 rpm
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI5,190 rpm1,610 rpm5,440 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEos3.2 V6VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.0 s
26.9 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
157 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 has 50 hp more than Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 50 hp (37 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
1,373 kg
3,027 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
247 km/h
153 mph
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V67.3 s
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI6.7 s

Although Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 has more power, Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
598 km
371 mi
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
658 km
409 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
247 km/h
153 mph
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
292 L
10.3 cu ft
Length
4,256 mm
167.6 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEos3.2 V6VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
250 hp
186 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
6.7 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,373 kg
3,027 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
292 L
10.3 cu ft
Length
4,256 mm
167.6 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Range score
598 km
371 mi
658 km
409 mi
Trunk score
205 L
7.2 cu ft
292 L
10.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km13.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi21.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year1,995 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Has 50 hp more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 166 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 60 km (37 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 87 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
GTS 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI
3.2 V6
R 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 16V TFSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
3.2 V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
3.2 V6
2.7
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
3.2 V6
1.3 Wankel
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
2.0 TSI
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
3.2 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.0 TSI
125i
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsBMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i
3.2 V6
630i
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsBMW6 Series (E63)630i
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 vs Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster