Volkswagen Eos
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6vsRenault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II)
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight170 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,539kg3,393lb | 1,355kg2,987lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.1s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 81.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.1s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km371mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,168cc193cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,407mm174in | 4,228mm166in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,617mm103in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,517mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 205L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 380L | 1,190L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.1 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 230 hp 172 kW |
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 has 20 hp more than Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 7.3 s |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
Although Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 has more power, Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 598 km 371 mi |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.3 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 371 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 | Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Is 184 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























