Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6vsRenault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos

3.2 V6

250 hp3168 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2009
VS

Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II)

RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

230 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2006-2008

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,355 kg
    2,987 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    170 hp/t
    127 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.4 L/100 km
    20.6 mpg US
    24.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    330 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    56/100

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    247 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEos3.2 V6RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
250hp186kW
230hp172kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
310Nm229lb-ft
Curb weight
1,539kg3,393lb
1,355kg2,987lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
1,800kg3,968lb
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
98.1s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
81.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
29.1s
Calculated
28.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
598km371mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,168cc193cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,407mm174in
4,228mm166in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,777mm70in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,436mm57in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,617mm103in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,517mm60in
Rear track
1,553mm61in
1,521mm60in
Trunk volume
205L
330L
Max trunk volume
380L
1,190L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
55L
60L
CO2 emissions-
199g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16VPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
  • Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEos3.2 V66,250 rpm2,750 rpm6,500 rpm
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEos3.2 V6RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.1 s
28.0 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
230 hp
172 kW

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 has 20 hp more than Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
310 Nm
229 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
1,355 kg
2,987 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
247 km/h
153 mph
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 has more power, Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
598 km
371 mi
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
714 km
444 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
247 km/h
153 mph
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
230 hp
172 kW
6.5 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,228 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.3 s
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEos3.2 V6RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
230 hp
172 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
310 Nm
229 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
6.5 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,355 kg
2,987 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,228 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Range score
598 km
371 mi
714 km
444 mi
CO2 score
-
199 g/km
Trunk score
205 L
7.2 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

  • Is 184 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 125 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 vs Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 Turbo 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster