Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTSvsVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Brera

3.2 JTS

260 hp3195 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2005-2010
VS

Volkswagen Eos

3.2 V6

250 hp3168 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,539 kg
    3,393 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    162 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.4 L/100 km
    17.6 mpg US
    21.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    598 km
    371 mi
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    47/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
260hp194kW
250hp186kW
Torque
322Nm237lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
247 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
97.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
97.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
27.6s
Calculated
29.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
579km359mi
Calculated
598km371mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,195cc195cu in
3,168cc193cu in
Length
4,413mm174in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,830mm72in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,372mm54in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,525mm99in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,579mm62in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,553mm61in
Trunk volume
300L
205L
Max trunk volume
610L
380L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
55L
CO2 emissions
284g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTSVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS6,200 rpm4,500 rpm6,450 rpm
VolkswagenEos3.2 V66,250 rpm2,750 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.6 s
29.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
247 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
260 hp
194 kW
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
247 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS7.0 s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V67.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
579 km
359 mi
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
598 km
371 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
260 hp
194 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
247 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,413 mm
173.7 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,413 mm
173.7 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
579 km
359 mi
598 km
371 mi
CO2 score
284 g/km
-
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTSVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.18 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.08 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,176 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 95 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Has 8 Nm more
  • Is 181 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2 JTS
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSvsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
3.2 JTS
3.0 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSvsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
3.2 JTS
3.6 FSI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSvsVolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
3.2 V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
3.2 JTS
3.2 FSI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSvsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
3.2 V6
2.7
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
3.2 JTS
630i
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSvsBMW6 Series (E63)630i
3.2 V6
1.3 Wankel
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
3.2 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS vs Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster