Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6vsAlfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos

3.6 FSI V6

260 hp3597 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2009-2010
VS

Alfa Romeo Brera

3.2 JTS

260 hp3195 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2005-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,591 kg
    3,508 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    122 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.2 L/100 km
    17.8 mpg US
    21.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    598 km
    371 mi
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
Power
260hp194kW
260hp194kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
322Nm237lb-ft
Curb weight
1,591kg3,508lb
1,720kg3,792lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
99.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
98.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
25.7s
Calculated
27.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
598km371mi
Calculated
579km359mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,597cc220cu in
3,195cc195cu in
Length
4,407mm174in
4,413mm174in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,830mm72in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,372mm54in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,525mm99in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,553mm61in
1,559mm61in
Ground clearance
106mm4in
-
Trunk volume
183L
300L
Max trunk volume
358L
610L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions-
284g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTSPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V66,000 rpm2,400-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS6,200 rpm4,500 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.7 s
27.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
260 hp
194 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
322 Nm
237 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
1,591 kg
3,508 lb
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
1,720 kg
3,792 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V66.9 s
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS7.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
598 km
371 mi
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
579 km
359 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
260 hp
194 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
183 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,413 mm
173.7 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
6.9 s
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS
Power
260 hp
194 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,591 kg
3,508 lb
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
183 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,413 mm
173.7 in
Height
1,372 mm
54.0 in
Range score
598 km
371 mi
579 km
359 mi
CO2 score
-
284 g/km
Trunk score
183 L
6.5 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km21.18 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi34.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year3,176 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6

  • Has 28 Nm more
  • Is 129 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS

  • Has 117 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6 FSI V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
3.2 JTS
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSvsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
3.6 FSI V6
R 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
3.2 JTS
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSvsVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
3.6 FSI V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
3.2 JTS
3.0 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSvsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
3.6 FSI V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
3.6 FSI V6
CLC 350 V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsMercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6
3.2 JTS
3.2i V6 24V
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
3.6 FSI V6
R 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI
3.2 JTS
630i
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTSvsBMW6 Series (E63)630i
3.6 FSI V6
630i
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsBMW6 Series (E63)Facelift 2007630i
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 vs Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS - car comparison - FastVsFaster