Volkswagen Eos
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6vsAUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A5 Coupe (8T3)
3.2 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,591kg3,508lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 84.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 24.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km371mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,597cc220cu in | 3,197cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,407mm174in | 4,625mm182in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,372mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,751mm108in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,577mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 106mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 183L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 358L | 829L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 213g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 24.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 160 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW |
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 598 km 371 mi |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 371 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 213 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 183 L 6.5 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 | AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 16 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 98 km (61 mi) more estimated range
- Has 272 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























