AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6vsVolkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos
3.6 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight177 hp/t132 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range793 km493 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,591kg3,508lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 99.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 25.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 793km493mi Calculated | 598km371mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,197cc195cu in | 3,597cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,625mm182in | 4,407mm174in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,751mm108in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,553mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 106mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 183L |
| Max trunk volume | 829L | 358L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 192g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 25.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 6.4 s |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 793 km 493 mi |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 598 km 371 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 793 km 493 mi | 598 km 371 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 192 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 183 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 | Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 91 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 195 km (121 mi) more estimated range
- Has 272 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 20 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























