Volkswagen Eos
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,563 kg3,446 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range775 km481 mi
- Largest trunk205 L
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,591kg3,508lb | 1,563kg3,446lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 101.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 33.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km371mi Calculated | 775km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,597cc220cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,407mm174in | 4,423mm174in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,444mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 106mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 183L | 205L |
| Max trunk volume | 358L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 165g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 33.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 has 50 hp more than Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 598 km 371 mi |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 775 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 371 mi | 775 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 165 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 183 L 6.5 cu ft | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 | Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Is 28 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 177 km (110 mi) more estimated range
- Has 22 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























