Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIvsRenault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna Coupe
2.0 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,503 kg3,314 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range825 km513 mi
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 205hp153kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,563kg3,446lb | 1,503kg3,314lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,923kg4,239lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.9s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 98.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.7s Calculated | 33.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 775km481mi Calculated | 825km513mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,423mm174in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,444mm57in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 205L | 423L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.7 s | 33.7 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW |
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 7.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 775 km 481 mi |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 825 km 513 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 205 hp 153 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 775 km 481 mi | 825 km 513 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI | Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Has 218 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























