Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIvsPeugeot RCZ 1.6 THP

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2010-2015
VS

Peugeot RCZ

1.6 THP

200 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,297 kg
    2,859 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    821 km
    510 mi
  • Largest trunk
    321 L
  • Best overall score
    51/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
Power
210hp157kW
200hp149kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
275Nm203lb-ft
Curb weight
1,563kg3,446lb
1,297kg2,859lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
1,780kg3,924lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
101.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
92.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
33.5s
Calculated
31.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
775km481mi
Calculated
821km510mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,423mm174in
4,290mm169in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,958mm77in
Height
1,444mm57in
1,362mm54in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,612mm103in
Front track
1,545mm61in
-
Rear track
1,547mm61in
-
Trunk volume
205L
321L
Max trunk volume-
639L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
55L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIPeugeot RCZ 1.6 THPPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP6,800 rpm1,700 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.5 s
31.7 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
200 hp
149 kW

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP.

The biggest power difference is between Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
275 Nm
203 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
1,563 kg
3,446 lb
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
1,297 kg
2,859 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI7.8 s
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP7.5 s

Although Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI has more power, Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
775 km
481 mi
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
821 km
510 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
238 km/h
148 mph
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,290 mm
168.9 in
Height
1,362 mm
53.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.8 s
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
Power
210 hp
157 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
275 Nm
203 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.5 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,563 kg
3,446 lb
1,297 kg
2,859 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,290 mm
168.9 in
Height
1,362 mm
53.6 in
Range score
775 km
481 mi
821 km
510 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
-
Trunk score
205 L
7.2 cu ft
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIPeugeot RCZ 1.6 THP
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP

  • Is 266 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 46 km (29 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 116 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
1.6 THP
R 1.6 THP
VS
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THPvsPeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI
1.6 THP
3.0 V6
VS
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THPvsPeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TDI V6
1.6 THP
1.8 TBi
VS
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THPvsAlfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi
2.0 TSI
E 250 CDI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
1.6 THP
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THPvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
1.6 THP
2.0 TSI
VS
PeugeotRCZ1.6 THPvsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsSubaruBRZ I2.0
Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI vs Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP - car comparison - FastVsFaster