Peugeot RCZ
Car comparison
Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THPvsRenault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna Coupe
2.0 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,297 kg2,859 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score89/100
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Most powerful205 hp153 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best estimated range825 km513 mi
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 205hp153kW |
| Torque | 275Nm203lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,297kg2,859lb | 1,503kg3,314lb |
| Gross weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,923kg4,239lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 97.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.7s Calculated | 33.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 825km513mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,290mm169in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,958mm77in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,362mm54in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,612mm103in | 2,690mm106in |
| Trunk volume | 321L | 423L |
| Max trunk volume | 639L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 6,800 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.7 s | 33.5 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 200 hp 149 kW |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo has 5 hp more than Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 275 Nm 203 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 7.5 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 7.8 s |
Although Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo has more power, Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 821 km 510 mi |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 825 km 513 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 205 hp 153 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 275 Nm 203 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 825 km 513 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP | Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP
- Is 206 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Has 4 km (3 mi) more estimated range
- Has 102 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























