Volkswagen Scirocco III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIvsPeugeot RCZ 1.6 THP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot RCZ
1.6 THP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP
- Lightest1,297 kg2,859 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range821 km510 mi
- Largest trunk321 L
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 275Nm203lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,318kg2,906lb | 1,297kg2,859lb |
| Gross weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 92.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.5s Calculated | 31.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 733km456mi Calculated | 821km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,256mm168in | 4,290mm169in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,958mm77in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,362mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,612mm103in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 312L | 321L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,006L | 639L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 6,800 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.5 s | 31.7 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP and Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 275 Nm 203 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 1,318 kg 2,906 lb |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 6.9 s |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP and Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 733 km 456 mi |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 821 km 510 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.9 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | PeugeotRCZ1.6 THP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 275 Nm 203 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,318 kg 2,906 lb | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 733 km 456 mi | 821 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI | Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP
- Is 21 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 88 km (54 mi) more estimated range
- Has 9 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























