Car comparison

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Scirocco III

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2009-2014
VS

Volkswagen Eos

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2009-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,318 kg
    2,906 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    119 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    312 L
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    764 km
    475 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
Power
210hp157kW
210hp157kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,318kg2,906lb
1,497kg3,300lb
Gross weight
1,760kg3,880lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
83.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
98.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
28.5s
Calculated
33.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
733km456mi
Calculated
764km475mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,256mm168in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,404mm55in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,569mm62in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,553mm61in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
106mm4in
Trunk volume
312L
205L
Max trunk volume
1,006L
380L
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Eos 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.5 s
33.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
1,318 kg
2,906 lb
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
1,497 kg
3,300 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI6.9 s
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
733 km
456 mi
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
764 km
475 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
6.9 s
238 km/h
148 mph
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
312 L
11.0 cu ft
Length
4,256 mm
167.6 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.9 s
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,318 kg
2,906 lb
1,497 kg
3,300 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
312 L
11.0 cu ft
Length
4,256 mm
167.6 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
733 km
456 mi
764 km
475 mi
Trunk score
312 L
11.0 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

  • Is 179 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 107 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI

  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster