Renault Laguna Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurbovsVolkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best estimated range825 km513 mi
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,497 kg3,300 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 205hp153kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,503kg3,314lb | 1,497kg3,300lb |
| Gross weight | 1,923kg4,239lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 98.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.5s Calculated | 33.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 825km513mi Calculated | 764km475mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,407mm174in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,553mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 106mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 423L | 205L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 380L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.5 s | 33.9 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
Although Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI has more power, Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 825 km 513 mi |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 764 km 475 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 205 hp 153 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 825 km 513 mi | 764 km 475 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo | Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
- Has 218 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 6 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























