Subaru BRZ I
Car comparison
Subaru BRZ I 2.0vsVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru BRZ I 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,202 kg2,650 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk243 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range775 km481 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruBRZ I2.0 | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 205Nm151lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,202kg2,650lb | 1,563kg3,446lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 101.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 33.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 725km450mi Calculated | 775km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,240mm167in | 4,423mm174in |
| Width | 1,775mm70in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,444mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 243L | 205L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 165g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru BRZ I 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 7,000 rpm | 6,400-6,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruBRZ I2.0 | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 33.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Subaru BRZ I 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Subaru BRZ I 2.0 and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 1,202 kg 2,650 lb |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
Although Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI has more power, Subaru BRZ I 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru BRZ I 2.0 and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 725 km 450 mi |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 775 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Subaru BRZ I 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruBRZ I2.0 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruBRZ I2.0 | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,202 kg 2,650 lb | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 725 km 450 mi | 775 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 165 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 243 L 8.6 cu ft | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru BRZ I 2.0 | Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru BRZ I 2.0
- Is 361 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 75 Nm more
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























