Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6vsAlfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos

3.6 FSI V6

260 hp3597 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2009-2010
VS

Alfa Romeo Brera

3.2 JTS V6

260 hp3195 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2008-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.2 L/100 km
    17.8 mpg US
    21.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6

  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    169 hp/t
    126 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    636 km
    395 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Power
260hp194kW
260hp194kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
322Nm237lb-ft
Curb weight
1,591kg3,508lb
1,540kg3,395lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
99.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
97.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
25.6s
Calculated
25.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
598km371mi
Calculated
636km395mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,597cc220cu in
3,195cc195cu in
Length
4,407mm174in
4,410mm174in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,830mm72in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,341mm53in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,528mm100in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,553mm61in
1,559mm61in
Ground clearance
106mm4in
-
Trunk volume
183L
300L
Max trunk volume
358L
610L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions-
260g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V66,000 rpm2,400-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V66,300 rpm4,500 rpm6,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.6 s
25.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
157 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
260 hp
194 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
322 Nm
237 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
1,591 kg
3,508 lb
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
1,540 kg
3,395 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V66.9 s
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V67.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
598 km
371 mi
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
636 km
395 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
260 hp
194 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
183 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,341 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
6.9 s
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,591 kg
3,508 lb
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
183 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,341 mm
52.8 in
Range score
598 km
371 mi
636 km
395 mi
CO2 score
-
260 g/km
Trunk score
183 L
6.5 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km19.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi30.98 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year2,888 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6

  • Has 28 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6

  • Is 51 kg lighter
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 117 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6 FSI V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
3.2 JTS V6
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
3.6 FSI V6
R 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenScirocco IIIR 2.0 TSI
3.2 JTS V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
3.2 JTS V6
630i
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsBMW6 Series (E63)Facelift 2007630i
3.6 FSI V6
CLC 350 V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsMercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6
3.6 FSI V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
3.2 JTS V6
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
3.6 FSI V6
R 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI
3.2 JTS V6
3.2i V6 24V
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
3.2 JTS V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
3.6 FSI V6
RS 2.0 16V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6vsRenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 vs Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster