Volkswagen Eos
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6vsRenault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III Coupe
RS 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Lightest1,387 kg3,058 lb
- Best power-to-weight180 hp/t134 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk377 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score58/100
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,591kg3,508lb | 1,387kg3,058lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 81.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km371mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,597cc220cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,407mm174in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,848mm73in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,435mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 106mm4in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 183L | 377L |
| Max trunk volume | 358L | 1,024L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 has 10 hp more than Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 6.1 s |
Although Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 has more power, Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 598 km 371 mi |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 371 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 183 L 6.5 cu ft | 377 L 13.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 | Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V
- Is 204 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
- Has 194 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























