Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6vsVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Brera

3.2 JTS V6

260 hp3195 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2008-2010
VS

Volkswagen Eos

3.2 V6

250 hp3168 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    169 hp/t
    126 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    636 km
    395 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,539 kg
    3,393 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.4 L/100 km
    17.6 mpg US
    21.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
260hp194kW
250hp186kW
Torque
322Nm237lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
247 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
97.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
97.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
29.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
636km395mi
Calculated
598km371mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,195cc195cu in
3,168cc193cu in
Length
4,410mm174in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,830mm72in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,341mm53in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,528mm100in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,579mm62in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,553mm61in
Trunk volume
300L
205L
Max trunk volume
610L
380L
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
55L
CO2 emissions
260g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V66,300 rpm4,500 rpm6,550 rpm
VolkswagenEos3.2 V66,250 rpm2,750 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
29.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
247 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
260 hp
194 kW
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
247 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V67.0 s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V67.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
636 km
395 mi
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
598 km
371 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
260 hp
194 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
247 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,341 mm
52.8 in
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,341 mm
52.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
636 km
395 mi
598 km
371 mi
CO2 score
260 g/km
-
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Consumption11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.25 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.98 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,888 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 95 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Has 8 Nm more
  • Is 1 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2 JTS V6
3.6 FSI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsVolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
3.2 JTS V6
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
3.2 JTS V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6
3.2 V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
3.2 JTS V6
630i
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsBMW6 Series (E63)Facelift 2007630i
3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
3.2 JTS V6
CLC 350 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsMercedes-BenzCLC (CL203)CLC 350 V6
3.2 V6
2.7
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
3.2 V6
1.3 Wankel
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
3.2 JTS V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6vsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 vs Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster