AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6vsAlfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Brera
3.2 JTS V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions213 g/km
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 2,065kg4,553lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 87.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.5s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | 614km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,197cc195cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,625mm182in | 4,413mm174in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,341mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,751mm108in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 829L | 610L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 213g/km | 270g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.5 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 has 5 hp more than Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 and AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 6.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 696 km 432 mi |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 614 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.8 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.2 FSI V6 | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | 614 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 213 g/km | 270 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6 | Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 8 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 82 km (51 mi) more estimated range
- Has 155 L more trunk volume
- Emits 57 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























