AUDI TT Coupe (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24VvsAlfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Brera
3.2 JTS V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Lightest1,410 kg3,109 lb
- Best power-to-weight177 hp/t132 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions247 g/km
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque322 Nm237 lb-ft
- Best estimated range614 km382 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,410kg3,109lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 2,065kg4,553lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 88.2s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 27.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | 614km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,189cc195cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,178mm164in | 4,413mm174in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,352mm53in | 1,341mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 290L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | 610L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 247g/km | 270g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 2,500-3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 27.4 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 has 10 hp more than AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 5.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 6.8 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 has more power, AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 583 km 362 mi |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 614 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW | 5.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.8 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | 614 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 247 g/km | 270 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V | Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 2 Nm more
- Has 32 km (20 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























