Car comparison

Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsMitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2010-2011
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer IX

Ralliart 2.0

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,365 kg
    3,009 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    176 hp/t
    131 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    244 km/h
    152 mph
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.6 L/100 km
    24.5 mpg US
    29.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,014 km
    630 mi
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeo2.0 TSIMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
211hp157kW
240hp179kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
309Nm228lb-ft
Curb weight
1,505kg3,318lb
1,365kg3,009lb
Gross weight
1,990kg4,387lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
66.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
61.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
24.0s
Calculated
23.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,014km630mi
Calculated
702km436mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,661mm184in
4,570mm180in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,760mm69in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,505mm59in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,635mm104in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,530mm60in
Trunk volume
460L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
59L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIMitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeo2.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.06,000 rpm3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeo2.0 TSIMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.0 s
23.6 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
100 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 has 29 hp more than Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
309 Nm
228 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
1,365 kg
3,009 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
244 km/h
152 mph
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI7.1 s
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.07.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
1,014 km
630 mi
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
702 km
436 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.1 s
244 km/h
152 mph
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeo2.0 TSIMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
211 hp
157 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.0 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in
Range score
1,014 km
630 mi
702 km
436 mi
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo 2.0 TSIMitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI

  • Has 11 Nm more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 312 km (194 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Has 29 hp more
  • Is 140 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Ralliart 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolvoS60 II2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Ralliart 2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Ralliart 2.0
3.5i V6 24V
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsNissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
Ralliart 2.0
3.5 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsRenaultLatitude3.5 V6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenJetta V2.0 TSI
Ralliart 2.0
2.5 T5
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
Ralliart 2.0
3.3 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsHyundaiSonata V (NF)Facelift 20083.3 V6
Ralliart 2.0
3.2 V6 FSI
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI vs Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster