Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score88/100
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,666mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 422L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,354L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 422 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI | Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























