Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,436 km892 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,583kg3,490lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 68.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 1,436km892mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,628mm182in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 4 hp more than Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.4 s |
Although Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has more power, Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,436 km 892 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 1,436 km 892 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Is 78 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 422 km (262 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























