Car comparison

Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2010-2011
VS

Volvo S60 II

2.4 D5

215 hp2400 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5

  • Most powerful
    215 hp
    160 kW
  • Highest torque
    440 Nm
    325 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,144 km
    711 mi
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    244 km/h
    152 mph
  • Lightest
    1,505 kg
    3,318 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    460 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeo2.0 TSIVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
211hp157kW
215hp160kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,505kg3,318lb
1,608kg3,545lb
Gross weight
1,990kg4,387lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
66.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
24.0s
Calculated
26.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,014km630mi
Calculated
1,144km711mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,400cc146cu in
Length
4,661mm184in
4,628mm182in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
460L
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeo2.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoS60 II2.4 D54,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeo2.0 TSIVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.0 s
26.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
100 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 4 hp more than Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
1,608 kg
3,545 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
244 km/h
152 mph
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI7.1 s
VolvoS60 II2.4 D57.6 s

Although Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has more power, Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
1,014 km
630 mi
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
1,144 km
711 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.1 s
244 km/h
152 mph
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeo2.0 TSI
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeo2.0 TSIVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
211 hp
157 kW
215 hp
160 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.6 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
1,608 kg
3,545 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,014 km
630 mi
1,144 km
711 mi
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo 2.0 TSIVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI

  • Is 103 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 130 km (81 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.4 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS40 II2.5 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenJetta V2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.5T 20V
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
250 V6
VS
SeatExeo2.0 TSIvsLexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2008250 V6
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI vs Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster