Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Largest trunk460 L
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 909km565mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,666mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 422L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,354L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
Although Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has more power, Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 909 km 565 mi |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 909 km 565 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 422 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI | Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 91 km (56 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























