Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta VI
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best estimated range909 km565 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,355kg2,987lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 67.3s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 909km565mi Calculated | 764km475mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,644mm183in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,778mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,482mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,651mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,538mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 909 km 565 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 764 km 475 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 909 km 565 mi | 764 km 475 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 145 km (90 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























